CL 2013 R18 - TTT (Brittas) 8/8/13
- Cormac Bracken
- Offline
- Posts: 31
Brian McNally
Oisin Boland
Cormac Bracken
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Paul Brosnan
- Offline
- Posts: 64
John Twomey
Paul Brosnan
Donnacha McCormack
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Cormac Bracken
- Offline
- Posts: 31
Brian McNally
Oisin Boland
Cormac Bracken
Any takers?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Edward O Mahoney
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Cormac Bracken
- Offline
- Posts: 31
Edward O Mahoney
Brian McNally
Oisin Boland
Cormac Bracken
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Bernard English
- Offline
- Posts: 102
Regards
Bernard
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Brian Mc
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 1732
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Brian Mc
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 1732
I won't have time to do a report before next week (which conveniently hides my shame), but for the league, that means that Eric still has a decent lead, and while Patrick O'Brien and Gavin Dodd can still beat him, they'd need to put in two stellar performances to do so. O'Brien is leading Dodd by one point now, 165 to 164, a reversal of last week. Rounding out the top five is Tom Blennerhassett and Liam Rowsome.
1 37'47"
Tom Blennerhassett
Eric Downey
Pat O'Brien
Brian McArdle
2 38'22"
Liam Rowsome
Peter Gerrard
Jamie Busher
Gavin Dodd
3 40'38"
Cormac Bracken
Oisin Boland
Brian McNally
Keith Harte
4 41'28"
Diarmuid Collins
Fionn Griffin
Ed O'Mahoney
Jules Cantwell
5 42'56"
Aidan Collins
Mike Hanley
Julian Moore
Ivan O'Brien
6 43'03"
Ryan McCarthy
Dave Tansey
Fionn Sheridan
Pat Conlon
7 44'00"
Paul Kane
John Twomey
Donnacha McCormack
Paul Brosnan
8 45'43"
Lucy Soden
Orla Hendron
Charlotte MacDonald
Monica Marconi
9 45'50"
Tim Kaye-Mellor
Naoise Sheridan
Conor Murnane
Sean Murnane
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Dave Mc
- Offline
- Posts: 1791
The InterClub League is doing their TTT next week, so it will be very interesting to see how their times compare.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Jules Cantwell
- Offline
- Posts: 63
Seriously impressive times, particularly the top 2 - gotta say, it's great motivation to see such competitive times out of fellow club members, definitely gives the impetus to put the effort in to up the game.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Michael Hanley
- Offline
- Posts: 374
Thanks to Ivan, Julian and of course Aidan for being part of the team. Apologies to them for my null performance. It was pretty much an Aidan-Julian team, all I did was slow them down, a LOT (5:10 by my reckoning).
Still, it was fun and a good workout, hopefully next year I will be able to contribute to the workload.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Brian Mc
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 1732
Seriously impressive times, particularly the top 2 - gotta say, it's great motivation to see such competitive times out of fellow club members, definitely gives the impetus to put the effort in to up the game.
And just think, the top time was completed with three-quarters of a team for two-thirds of the course! My excuse is Suir Valley. You'd think I'd be better at sprinting back on after getting the punctures down there, but apparently not.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Edward O Mahoney
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Patrick O'Brien
Was it stated somewhere beforehand that points would only be awarded to the top 3 teams?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Fergal Daly
Handicapping sounds logical, but at the end of the day it's a TT, it's a competition to see who can do the best time. Losing out on a place because another team have a five minute handicap seems ridiculous. It's also complicated. How do you handicap a team made up of two SS & two SLs?
I agree that maybe a discussion needs to be had around it. Maybe award points for the best 6 teams, but split into two fields.
So the best 3 teams from the S/SS grouping get points and the best 3 teams from SL/L grouping.
Since the team's time is determined by the first 3 across the line, then you can use a majority to determine which group they belong in:
e.g. if a team is made up of 2 x SS + 2 x SL and first across the line are the two SS & the SL, then that team is in the first grouping. On the other hand, if one of the SS guys is dropped and the other 3 cross the line, then they fall into the second grouping.
Since the team's time is dependent on the 3rd rider's time, then it's basically impossible to sandbag it; at the end of the day you will still need two very strong SL riders to win the SL/L grouping, one SS rider alone can't fiddle the system to win more points.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Brian Mc
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 1732
Was it stated somewhere beforehand that points would only be awarded to the top 3 teams?
It was stated by the committee on the night, as it meant ~12 riders getting points, which seemed a fair proportion of the turnout. Last year the top 8 of 17 got points, a little under half. Top 4 would've actually been the closest to that ratio, but you get the idea.
There's plenty of good ideas in there Fergal, and I'd suggest if you or anyone wants more input into how the league is run, come along to the AGM later in the year and join the league committee. They're the people in the background organising each night, and they have to take the decisions to try make things fair for everyone. Top six would've meant everyone except the youth team, the women's team, and one mean's team getting points, which seems a little generous to me, and a bit biased against the weaker teams.
Maybe top four or five might've been better, but they made the call on the night based on sign-on numbers. If you think next year the top six should get points, or the teams should be split between one from each cat, or points should be split between cats, join the committee and put those ideas to good use!
In the meantime, everyone has gotten TTT practice that they generally wouldn't get, and set themselves a benchmark to beat next year.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Ivan O'Brien
- Offline
- Posts: 96
A bit of generosity doesn't hurt, and it wouldn't impact on the final standings at the business end at all.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Diarmuid Collins
- Offline
- Posts: 280
I'm not in the running for prizes this year and thanks to the organizers I got to ride the TTT due to a surplus of marshals. I enjoyed the race and wasn't that put out by not getting any points.
However I have to agree that the TTT needs a bit of a review. It would be a bit difficult to organise teams in advance due to people not turning up, extra effort for the committee etc... so I would suggest that the fairest method would be to pick teams on the night and aim to have one rider from each group on the team, one from L,SL,SS,S. Could be first from each group signed on go out together etc...
Now that's not going to happen that all teams will be balanced but that could be the goal. It would even out the competition a bit and encourage riders from L and SL to race.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Paul Brosnan
- Offline
- Posts: 64
This will involve starting teams at 3 minute intervals. Riders are handicapped based on category:
S = 0 sec, SS = 10 sec, SL = 20 sec, L =30 sec. The handicaps will be added before the start. Each team gets in position at their designated start time, but held back until the handicap expires. Then they continue as normal.
e.g., Team X is allocated a start time of 7.03 and has a rider from each category, the clock starts for them at 7.03, but don't set off until 7.04.
Worst possible handicap is 2 minutes, which gives time for next team to get ready, etc.
Be gentle with me...going for that coffee now!
Paul.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Edward O Mahoney
I suppose I could have done something constructive at the start of the year and joined the league committee, however I'm far happier being the hurler on the ditch/moaner on the sidelines and criticising others decisions. However just this once I have decided to try and help by cutting through the Gordian Knot of awarding TTT points and employ my considerable dwarf sized intellect to solve the problem.
After an unbelieveably restless night I had mu Eureka moment just as dawn was breaking over the Dublin mountains and it is as follows: Each Limit rider would get a 90 second advantage over a Scratch rider, 60 second advantage over a Semi Scratch rider and 30 seconds over a Semi Limit rider. That way a Limit team would get a 6 minute advantage over a Scratch team, 4 mins over a Semi Scratch team and 2 mins over a Semi Limit team. A Semi Limit team would meanwhile get a 2 minute advantage over a Semi Scratch team but a 4 minute advantge over a Scratch team. That way teams will generally be riding with others of a similar ability as opposed to having teams drawn from a hat composed of all four categories which could prove very frustrating for a scratch rider while really exhausting for a limit rider who would soon be dropped.
However if there are mixed teams, for example a team of one semi scratch rider, 2 semi limit riders and one limit rider then the advantage they would have over a 4 man limit team would be 2 minutes: (one SS rider 60 secs) + (two SL riders 60 secs) + (no time penalty for limit rider). That same mixed team would have a 4 minute advantage over a 4 man Scratch team and a 2 minute advantage over a 4 man Semi Scratch team but no advantage over a 4 man Semi Limit team. Hope that was easy enough to follow. Looking at this years TTT results I don't think it would radically change the results but it would make it alot more competitive for everyone involved.
Please Log in to join the conversation.